You may have seen one or more of the fake acai berry news sites which are mocked up advertisements made to look like legitimate news reports from actual news orginizations. Here is a snapshot of one such advertisement:
There are logos of legitimate news organizations at the top such as CNN, CBS, NBC, Consumer Reports, and USA Today and the advertisement claims that the report is "as seen in" the news reports of these organizations.
Here is the FTC News Release from April, 19, 2011:
FTC Seeks to Halt 10 Operators of Fake News Sites from Making Deceptive Claims About Acai Berry Weight Loss Products
Internet Marketers Falsely Claim Endorsement from ABC, Fox News, CBS, CNN, USA Today, and Consumer Reports, FTC Alleges
The Federal Trade Commission is requesting federal courts to temporarily halt the allegedly deceptive tactics of 10 operations using fake news websites to market acai berry weight-loss products. The FTC seeks to permanently stop this misleading practice and has asked courts to freeze the operations’ assets pending trial.
According to the FTC, the defendants operate websites that are meant to appear as if they belong to legitimate news-gathering organizations, but in reality the sites are simply advertisements aimed at deceptively enticing consumers to buy the featured acai berry weight-loss products from other merchants.
The FTC complaints allege that typical fake news sites have titles such as “News 6 News Alerts,” “Health News Health Alerts,” or “Health 5 Beat Health News.” The sites often include the names and logos of major media outlets – such as ABC, Fox News, CBS, CNN, USA Today, and Consumer Reports – and falsely represent that the reports on the sites have been seen on these networks. An investigative-sounding headline on one such site proclaims “Acai Berry Diet Exposed: Miracle Diet or Scam?” The sub-headline reads, “As part of a new series: ‘Diet Trends: A look at America’s Top Diets’ we examine consumer tips for dieting during a recession.” The article that follows purports to document a reporter’s first-hand experience with acai berry supplements – typically claiming to have lost 25 pounds in four weeks.
“Almost everything about these sites is fake,” said David Vladeck, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “The weight loss results, the so-called investigations, the reporters, the consumer testimonials, and the attempt to portray an objective, journalistic endeavor.”
The Illinois Attorney General’s office is announcing an additional case against an affiliate marketer using fake news websites to promote acai berry weight-loss products.
The FTC will ask the courts to permanently bar the allegedly deceptive claims, and to require the companies to provide money for refunds to consumers who purchased the supplements and other products. The FTC charges that the defendants:
* make false and unsupported claims that acai berry supplements will cause rapid and substantial weight loss;
* deceptively represent that:
o their websites are objective news reports;
o independent tests demonstrate the effectiveness of the product, and
o comments following the “articles” on their websites reflect the views of independent consumers; and
* fail to disclose their financial relationships to the merchants selling the products.
The Federal Trade Commission has a new consumer alert to help consumers recognize and avoid deceptive claims made by fake news sites that market acai berries for weight loss. It also has a new video detailing the risks of free trials, which often are used to market acai berry supplements and other products.
According to the FTC complaints, in pitching the acai weight-loss products, the defendants post attention-grabbing ads on search engines and high volume websites, such as “Acai Berry EXPOSED – Health Reporter Discovers the Shocking Truth,” driving traffic to the fake news sites and ultimately to the sites where merchants sell the products. The FTC has received numerous complaints from consumers who paid between $70 and $100 for weight-loss products after having been deceived by fake news sites.
Reporters or commentators pictured on the sites are fictional and have not conducted the tests or experienced the results described in the reports, the FTC alleges. The “responses” and “comments” following the reports are simply additional advertising content, not independent statements from ordinary consumers. The defendants receive commissions when consumers buy the products or sign up for “free trials” on the product-selling sites – but they fail to adequately disclose their lack of objectivity and their financial incentive to get consumers to buy the products. According to the FTC, the defendants collectively have paid more than $10 million to advertise their fake news sites, and have likely received well in excess of that amount in ill-gotten commissions.
Derived from acai palm trees that are native to Central and South America, acai berry supplements are often marketed to consumers who hope to lose weight. In 2010, the FTC filed an action against acai berry marketer Central Coast Nutraceuticals for deceptively marketing acai berry supplements as weight-loss products, and “colon cleansers” as an aid for preventing cancer.
The defendants running the fake news sites who were charged in these cases make very similar claims that consumers can experience dramatic weight loss by taking acai berry supplements in combination with a companion product such as a so-called colon cleanser.
The Commission votes authorizing the staff to file the complaints and seek the temporary restraining orders in Beony International LLC; Circa Direct LLC; Copeac; Ricardo Labra; and Tanner Vaughn were 5-0. The Commission votes authorizing the staff to file the complaints and seek the temporary restraining orders in Coulomb Media, Inc.; DLXM, LLC; Charles Dunlevy; Zachary Graham; and Thou Lee were 4-1, with Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch voting no.
The FTC filed the 10 complaints and requests for temporary restraining orders in six federal courts. In the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, the agency filed complaints against Beony International LLC, Mario Milanovic, and Cody Adams; Zachary S. Graham, Ambervine Marketing LLC, and Encastle Inc.; Intermark Communications, Inc. also doing business as Copeac, and IMM Interactive; Ricardo Jose Labra; and Thou Lee, also doing business as TL Advertising. In the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, the agency filed a complaint against Circa Direct LLC and Andrew Davidson. In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, the agency filed a complaint against Coulomb Media, Inc., and Cody Low, also known as Joe Brooks. In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, the agency filed a complaint against DLXM, LLC, also doing business as DLXM LLC, and Michael Volozin, also known as Mikhail Volozin. In the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, the agency filed a complaint against Charles Dunlevy. In the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, the agency filed a complaint against Tanner Garrett Vaughn, also doing business as Lead Expose, Inc., and Uptown Media, Inc.
Consumer Reports Reaction to "ConsumerProductsDaily.com and Other Websites Using Their Logos
Consumer Reports has responded to complaints about deceptive websites which are claiming to be affiliated with or licensed by Consumer Reports in order to advertise acai berry scams and other products. Among these websites are consumerproductsdaily.com, consumerdigestweekly.com, weeklyhealthnow.com, healthnews10.com, and health9news.com. These websites basically publish "reports" implying that consumer reports and the other organizations listed have favorably reviewed the products being advertised. Here is a link to the Consumer Reports testimony about this matter. Consumer Reports also published an article at ConsumerReports.org: Beware of fake news online.
The Consumer Reports