<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Comments for page &quot;BASIC Progression and Bulgarian Split Squats&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.gustrength.com/eric-troy:bulgarian-squat-basic-progression/comments/show</link>
		<description></description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:09:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.gustrength.com/eric-troy:bulgarian-squat-basic-progression/comments/show#post-911953</guid>
				<title>(no title)</title>
				<link>http://www.gustrength.com/eric-troy:bulgarian-squat-basic-progression/comments/show#post-911953</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>rorshach</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>513814</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <blockquote> <p>As I've said TIME AND TIME AGAIN the exercise is the MOVEMENT, not the implement lifted! One more time. The exercise is the movement. Not the implement lifted.</p> <p>Just because you do a traditional exercise with a bag full of rice does not mean you just re-invented the wheel.</p> </blockquote> <p>Wow, that's a great article Eric. It cleared up a lot of stuff (that I didn't even think, needed clearing up!)<br /> This makes sense, all these movements are of a similar type, but people keep trying to hack them apart &amp; make them movements unto themselves, it just confuses people more than anything.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>
